gaza
Conference

Human shields. When humanitarian law turns against war victims

Neve Gordon
Neve
Gordon

Neve Gordon is a professor of human rights law at Queen Mary University of London and the Vice President of the British Society for Middle East Studies.  He is the author of Israel’s Occupation (University of California Press 2008). and the co-author of The Human Right to Dominate (Oxford University Press 2015) and  Human Shields. A History of People in the Line of Fire (University of California Press 2020). Neve Gordon has been a member at the Institute for Advanced Study at Princeton, and a visiting scholar at the University of California, Berkeley, Brown University, the University of Michigan, and SOAS, and is currently a board member of the International State Crime Initiative.

Nicola Perugini
Nicola
Perugini

Nicola Perugini teaches international politics at University of Edimburg. His research focuses mainly on the politics of international law, human rights, and violence. He is the co-author of The Human Right to Dominate (Oxford University Press 2015), Morbid Symptoms (Sharjah Biennial 13, 2017), and Human Shields. A History of People in the Line of Fire (University of California Press 2020). Nicola Perugini has published articles on war and the ethics of violence; the politics of human rights, humanitarianism, and international law; humanitarianism's visual cultures; war and embedded anthropology; refugees and asylum seekers; law, space and colonialism; settler-colonialism.

On Thursday June 12, 2025, the Crash team was delighted to welcome Neve Gordon and Nicola Perugini, for a conference entitled " Human shields. When humanitarian law turns against war victims". This meeting was prepared and moderated by Fabrice Weissman and Hakim Chkam. 

00:38 Presentation
03:27 Introduction
12:18 Human shields, attacks on hospitals, and the Gaza abyss
33:44 The Norm, the Law and the Protection of Hospitals in War Zones
57:05 Why should we still believe in the normative power of law in war situations?
01:01:36 Question 1: Wouldn’t social pressure be more effective than a legal ban?
01:11:29 Question 2: To what extent does the counterterrorism doctrine challenge the principles of distinction established by the Geneva Conventions?
01:21:37 Question 3: To what extent is the US-influenced approach of 'algorithmic governmentality' being applied in Gaza?
01:25:23 Question 4: What can we realistically expect from a ban, given that states can always find ways to circumvent legal provisions?
01:33:04 Question 5: How relevant is the comparison with the ban on landmines?

“Even war has rules”. This is the slogan brandished by MSF, the United Nations and the ICRC to protest against the bombing of health facilities and the massacre of civilians in Gaza and in many other conflicts. “Yes, war has rules”, retorts the Israeli army, but in this case it's Hamas that's violating them by using hospitals and the population as “human shields”. As such, the Israeli armed forces are not guilty of any crime in causing the “accidental” death of civilians, wounded and health workers in its fight against the perpetrators of the October 7 atrocities.

While not new, this line of reasoning is taken to extremes by the Israeli government, whose propaganda invokes international humanitarian law to justify its genocidal violence against the Palestinian population. As Neve Gordon and Nicola Perugini point out, international humanitarian law (IHL) does not offer unconditional protection to health facilities and non-combatants, especially when they are described as “human shields”. The latter can then be bombed, provided that “military necessity” justifies it and that “precautions” have been taken to avoid collateral casualties “excessive in relation to the military advantage anticipated”.

Under these conditions, isn't calling for respect for international humanitarian law to protest against the bombing of hospitals and civilians counter-productive? In practice, is IHL not the ally of the most powerful states, authorizing war violence against unarmed populations? To which extent does the consent of European states to the reversal of IHL against war victims in Gaza constitutes a turning point? How can we strengthen the normative framework protecting hospitals and civilians in conflicts, and increase the political cost of mass violence?

These are the questions we discussed on Thursday June 12 from 6.30pm with Neve Gordon and Nicola Perugini. Neve Gordon is former director of Physicians for Human Rights. He teaches international law at Queen Mary University of London. Nicola Perugini is Professor of International Relations at Edinburgh University. Both published in 2020: Human Shields. A History of People in the Line of Fire (University of California Press 2020).

References:

To cite this content :
Neve Gordon, Nicola Perugini, “Human shields. When humanitarian law turns against war victims”, 12 juin 2025, URL : https://msf-crash.org/en/conferences-debates/human-shields-when-humanitarian-law-turns-against-war-victims

If you would like to comment on this article, you can find us on social media or contact us here:

Contribute

Past events

A survivor of Gitarama in Ruhango, Rwanda, July 1994 Roger Job Conference

France in Rwanda. Guilty neutrality

02/11/2019 - 06:00 PM 08:00 PM Claudine Vidal Jean-Hervé Bradol

The CRASH team invited you to the screening-debate “France in Rwanda. Guilty neutrality” on Monday 11th of February 2019 from 6 to 8pm, in the 1rst floor room of the 8 rue Saint-Sabin. A documentary film by Robert Genoud and Claudine Vidal (Director Emeritus for research at the CNRS, member of the CRASH scientific committee at MSF), and produced by EUP. Before and after the screening, Claudine Vidal and Jean-Hervé Bradol, both actors of MSF mobilization between 1994 and 1998 launched the discussion.

Read more
conf caroline iz Conference

Healing foreigners in France: The State and the civil society organisations from the 80s to the 90s

12/17/2018 - 06:00 PM 08:00 PM Caroline Izambert

The CRASH team invited you to the debate-conference “Healing foreigners in France: The State and the civil society organisations from the 80s to the 90s” on Monday 17th of December 2018. We hosted Caroline Izambert, who recently defended, at the EHESS, her PhD thesis focusing on the foreigners’ access to healthcare in France. Her title: “Heal foreigners?” The State and the civil society organisations for the health coverage of the poor and foreigners in France from the 1980s to the present day. This conference was prepared and moderated by Michaël Neuman.

Read more
conf boudou Conference

Borders and Hospitality

11/26/2018 - 06:00 PM 08:00 PM Benjamin Boudou

The Crash team had the pleasure of welcoming Benjamin Boudou, politician and researcher at the Max Planck Institute, for a conference-debate on November 26, 2018. The meeting was prepared and moderated by Michaël Neuman.

Read more
De gauche à droite, Michaël Neuman, Lise Barnéoud et Emmanuel Baron lors de la conférence du Crash du 5 décembre 2017 sur la vaccination MSF-Crash Conference

Immunization: new perspectives on vaccines - Conference with Lise Barnéoud

12/05/2017 - 06:00 PM 08:00 PM Lise Barnéoud

Lise Barnéoud was a Crash guest speaker at a conference on vaccination held on December 5, 2017. A discussion with Epicentre, Crash and the MSF Medical Department allowed us to exchange views on vaccinal policy, which remains a cornerstone of MSF operations and a recurring subject of discussion and controversy. This meeting was prepared and moderated by Michaël Neuman and Emmanuel Baron.

 

Read more
Michaël Neuman durant une conférence du Crash Conference

Eyal Weizman - Forensic Architecture at work

02/15/2016 - 07:00 PM 09:30 PM Eyal Weizman

Eyal Weizman, founder of Forensic Architecture at Goldsmiths College, University of London, presented his project and a number of his achievements at a Crash conference held on July 2, 2015. The event was organized and moderated by Michaël Neuman.

Read more