Eyal Weizman - Forensic Architecture at work
Michaël Neuman
Eyal Weizman, the founder of « Forensic Architecture » at the Goldsmiths College (University of London) came to present the project as well as a number of his works at a MSF - Crash conference organised at MSF on July 2, 2015.
At the juncture of cartography and image analysis, judicial expertise and architecture, in places and situations of State violence, "Forensic Architecture" sheds light on the notions of crime by turning "spaces" into evidence.
Eyal Weizman has focused his work, in particular, on the Palestinian Territories and the Israeli occupation. He has analysed the architecture of the colonisation through the prism of surveillance technology, reflected on the convergence of political, military and humanitarian interests, and worked on reconstructing aerial attacks through examining images of rubble. Although not a new subject, this new angle provides totally new reflection on these complex issues.
To cite this content :
Michaël Neuman, “Eyal Weizman - Forensic Architecture at work”, 15 février 2016, URL : https://msf-crash.org/en/conferences-debates/eyal-weizman-forensic-architecture-work
If you want to criticize or develop this content, you can find us on twitter or directly on our site.
ContributePast events
Living a Natural Disaster
11/03/2010 - 06:00 PM 08:00 PMPeople wandering through the rubble in Haiti, arms outstretched begging for help amid the floods in Pakistan: the media coverage of disasters invariably features helpless victims, overwhelmed by the disaster, waiting to be helped...
From their point of view
03/10/2009 - 06:00 PM 08:30 PMThe reasons why we are accepted, tolerated or sometimes rejected in the contexts where we work are often obscure. Caroline Abu-Sada and her team of sociology student shed some light on these issues.
Grounds for divorce ? MSF and the international criminal court
04/08/2009 - 06:30 PM 08:30 PMIn 1998 MSF decided to support the creation of the International Criminal Court. 10 years later MSF stated that it ‘would not cooperate and would not transmit any information to the ICC'. How can we explain this change of position?