Review "Medical Humanitarianism: Ethnographies of practice"
Michaël Neuman's review of "Medical Humanitarianism: Ethnographies of practice" by Sharon Abramowitz and Catherine Panter-Brick (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2015). Published in Journal of Refugee Studies.
Medical Humanitarianism: Ethnographies of practice, which opens with a foreword by Peter Piot, the eminent microbiologist who discovered the Ebola virus and is director of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, and concludes with a post- face by Peter Redfield, whose pioneering research has provided new insights into humanitarian work thanks to its anthropological approach, was surely no disappointment to these two illustrious readers.
Organised in three sections, this edited volume provides a variety of thought-provoking contributions that combine to produce an original and remarkable work. Medical humanitarianism is a series of stories about people, of journeys through reality, illustrating the complex dynamics at play in the relationship between aid workers and the people they are meant to help.
Sharon Abramowitz and Catherine Panter-Brick’s book is important on more than one level. Firstly, it is a valuable and highly accessible tool for practitioners and researchers on the one hand, and observers of the sector on the other – although the two categories are not of course mutually exclusive. It also presents a remarkable diversity of situations. While describing numerous situations in the Africa context, it also includes contributions on Pakistan, such as when it looks at the safety of national employees, as well as setting out in more unexpected directions, like the description of the social and ethical circumstances of practicing medicine in Haiti. While building on well-rooted anthropological critical analysis of development (David Mosse, Jean- Pierre Olivier de Sardan) and humanitarianism (Dider Fassin, Peter Redfield and Miriam Ticktin), the book offers observations, often empathetic, occasionally even benevolent. Certain contributions are all the harsher.
For instance, in a particularly incisive chapter by Tim Allen, readers are encouraged to think critically about the role of aid organisations in the Gulu district IDP camps in Uganda. In the context of a counter-insurgency strategy aimed at eradicating the Lord’s Resistance Army, the description of the role of humanitarian organisations in setting up insecure and precarious camps certainly raises the question of the organisations’ capacity to devise their interventions. Humanitarian workers’ participation in processes to control people, processes that are sometimes even totalitarian or criminal (e.g. Ethiopia 1985; Zaire, Goma 1994), is a recognised phenomenon. However, his journey across east Africa is salutary, inasmuch as it shows the almost non-existent questioning of intervention approaches and their consequences.
For MSF, of which this reviewer is a member, Sharon Abramowitz’s chapter on the medical and economic consequences of the organisation’s interruption of medical projects in Liberia is a cruel reminder of the fact that the only moment when an organisation has complete control over its choices is when it chooses to withdraw. It can do so without worrying about the consequences, since its time is over.
Of equal interest is the brilliant illustration of the limits imposed by vertical projects. The undoubted success of the Carter Foundation’s campaign to eradicate the Guinea worm, described by Amy Moran-Thomas in the Ghanaian context, should not make us forget that it is almost always implemented in situations where access to drinking water and basic medicines is often very limited. The allocation of significant resources to the fight against this non-life threatening disease thus needs to be considered taking into account the triage process – the selection between those who will be saved and those who will not – which precedes it. This is indeed a key question at a time when the campaign to eradicate polio is still in place while facing opposition on many levels, including from those who see in it a proof of imbalance marked by the lack of attention that donors and authorities pay to access to primary care. The question of triage is also at the heart of an instructive chapter on military humanitarian medicine in Afghanistan. This reviewer feels it is important here to highlight Stuart Gordon’s transparency about his status as author and actor, as a former member of the British Armed Forces. Conversely, one of the book’s limits is the lack of clarity regarding the authors’ position vis-a-vis their subject: it would possibly have been difficult to do things differently given the limited length of each chapter, but for some chapters, it would certainly have been useful to know a little more about the researcher’s circumstances.
Other contributions are lighter in tone, or at least, illustrative of the little arrangements of daily life. In this respect, Ilil Benjamin’s work on Israel is certainly original while also bringing to mind research by Miriam Ticktin and Estelle d’Halluin on asylum in France. He describes the incorporation of humanitarian and compassionate approaches into frameworks determined by the State, often producing an uncomfortable space for co-management. Michel Agier coined the expression: the ‘management of undesirables’.
Sharon Abramowitz and Catherine Panter-Brick’s volume is occasionally, if not often, an uncomfortable read which raises painful questions. Nevertheless, as Peter Redfield so rightly points out in his postface, nothing here should come as a surprise. For anyone who knows about humanitarian practices in the field, the many little arrangements that have to be made, the minor daily dilemmas and more deep- seated questions about the nature and impact of medical humanitarian projects, the book’s chapters will serve as a reminder and, more especially, a plea to open the door to the sort of critical thinking this book, greatly to its merit, shows us to be absolutely vital. For in the profoundly uncertain world of aid, development and humanitarianism and the medical practices they encompass, the study of deviations, which first need to be identified, is certainly one of the most unarguably useful contributions the social sciences have made to the sector. I hope that a great many of my colleagues open the pages of this book and find it a fascinating read. It is an uncomfortable read, but surely that is the goal?
Medical Humanitarianism: Ethnographies of practice. Edited by Sharon Abramowitz and Catherine Panter-Brick. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2015. 274 pp. £45.43. ISBN 978-0-8122-4732-9
To cite this content :
Michaël Neuman, “Review "Medical Humanitarianism: Ethnographies of practice"”, 30 mars 2017, URL : https://msf-crash.org/en/medicine-and-public-health/review-medical-humanitarianism-ethnographies-practice
If you want to criticize or develop this content, you can find us on twitter or directly on our site.Contribute